Shahid, S., Islam, J. U., Farooqi, R. & Thomas, G. Affordable luxury consumption: An emerging market’s perspective. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 18(2), 316–336 (2023).
Google Scholar
Abbate, S., Centobelli, P. & Cerchione, R. The digital and sustainable transition of the agri-food sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 187, 122222 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. How blockchain adoption affects supply chain sustainability in the fashion industry: A systematic review and case studies. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. (2023).
Google Scholar
Srivastava, A., Mallela, K. M., Deorkar, N. & Brophy, G. Manufacturing challenges and rational formulation development for AAV viral vectors. J. Pharm. Sci. 110(7), 2609–2624 (2021).
Google Scholar
Islam, J. U., Farooqi, R. & Thomas, G. Affordable luxury consumption: An emerging market’s perspective. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 18(2), 316–336 (2021).
Chen, Y. How blockchain adoption affects supply chain sustainability in the fashion industry: A systematic review and case studies. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 31(6), 1–28 (2023).
Islam, M. M., Perry, P. & Gill, S. Mapping environmentally sustainable practices in textiles, apparel and fashion industries: A systematic literature review. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 25, 331–353 (2021).
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V., Cavallo, C., Catellani, P., Del Giudice, T. & Cicia, G. Why do consumers intend to purchase natural food? Integrating theory of planned behavior, value-belief-norm theory, and trust. Nutrients 13(6), 1904 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lira, J. S. D. & Costa, M. F. D. Theory of planned behavior, ethics and intention of conscious consumption in Slow Fashion Consumption. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 26(5), 905–925 (2022).
Rizkalla, N., Lestari, E. D., Arinto, B., Purnamaningsih, P. & Sulistyarini, N. Uncovering the determinants of environmentally-friendly apparel purchase intention in Indonesia: Incorporating environmental concern and knowledge into the theory of planned behavior. Econ. Manag. Sustain. 7(1), 43–58 (2022).
Google Scholar
Saricam, C., & Okur, N. Analysing the consumer behavior regarding sustainable fashion using theory of planned behavior. In Consumer Behavior and Sustainable Fashion Consumption. (Springer, 2019).
Lawton, R., Conner, M. & McEachan, R. Desire or reason: Predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychol. 28(1), 56 (2009).
Google Scholar
Kumar, N., Garg, P. & Singh, S. Pro-environmental purchase intention towards eco-friendly apparel: Augmenting the theory of planned behavior with perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concern. J. Glob. Fashion Mark. 13(2), 134–150 (2022).
Google Scholar
Conner, M. Affective attitudes, anticipated affect and health behaviors. In Affective Determinants of Health-Related Behavior (Oxford University Press, 2018).
Conner, M. & Norman, P. Predicting long-term healthy eating behavior: Understanding the role of cognitive and affective attitudes. Psychol. Health 36(10), 1165–1181 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zahid, H., Ali, S., Danish, M. & Sulaiman, M. A. B. A. Factors affecting consumers intentions to purchase dairy products in Pakistan: A cognitive affective-attitude approach. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 36(3), 347–372 (2022).
Google Scholar
Conner, M., van Harreveld, F. & Norman, P. Attitude stability as a moderator of the relationships between cognitive and affective attitudes and behavior. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 61(1), 121–142 (2022).
Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. Using social norms as a lever of social influence. In The Science of Social Influence, 167–191 (Psychology Press, 2011).
Maloney, J., Lee, M. Y., Jackson, V. & Miller-Spillman, K. A. Consumer willingness to purchase organic products: Application of the theory of planned behavior. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 5(4), 308–321 (2014).
Google Scholar
Dewanto, K. N. & Belgiawan, P. F. The influence of social norms and attitude in sustainable fashion product purchase behavior. Am. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 3, 64–75 (2020).
Koay, K. Y., Cheah, C. W. & Lom, H. S. An integrated model of consumers’ intention to buy second-hand clothing. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 50(11), 1358–1377 (2022).
Google Scholar
Han, T. & Stoel, L. The effect of social norms and product knowledge on purchase of organic cotton and fair-trade apparel. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 7(2), 89–102 (2016).
Google Scholar
Farrow, K., Grolleau, G. & Ibanez, L. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140, 1–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. H. & Seock, Y. K. The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: The mediating role of personal norms. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 51, 83–90 (2019).
Google Scholar
Borusiak, B., Szymkowiak, A., Horska, E., Raszka, N. & Żelichowska, E. Towards building sustainable consumption: A study of second-hand buying intentions. Sustainability 12(3), 875 (2020).
Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M., Proença, J. F. & Macedo, R. Determinants of the purchase of secondhand products: An approach by the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability 15(14), 10912 (2023).
Google Scholar
Armitage, C. J. & Conner, M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A meta-analytic review. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 471–499 (2001).
Google Scholar
Manstead, A. S. R. The role of moral norm in the attitude–behavior relation. In Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context (Psychology Press, 2000).
Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J. & Bengtsson, M. Cause I’ll feel good! An investigation into the effects of anticipated emotions and personal moral norms on consumer pro-environmental behavior. J. Promot. Manag. 23, 163–183 (2017).
Google Scholar
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A. & Kalof, L. A Value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 6(2), 81–97 (1999).
Canova, L., Bobbio, A. & Manganelli, A. M. Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products. Sustain. Dev. 31(2), 1069–1083 (2023).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V. et al. Explaining consumer purchase behavior for organic milk: Including trust and green self-identity within the theory of planned behavior. Food Qual. Prefer. 76, 1–9 (2019).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V., Conner, M., Caso, D. & Catellani, P. Rational and moral motives to reduce red and processed meat consumption. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 50, 744–755 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jang, J. I. & Choo, H. J. Consumption of counterfeit luxury fashion products based on the theory of planned behavior. J. Korean Soc. Cloth. Text. 28(2), 79–94 (2015).
Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O. & Guillaumie, L. Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 155, 104660 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stolz, K. Why do (n’t) we buy second-hand luxury products?. Sustainability 14(14), 8656 (2022).
Google Scholar
Effron, D. A. (2016) 3 Beyond “being good frees us to be bad”. In Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment: The Roots of Dishonesty, vol. 33 (2022).
Schultz, W. P., Khazian, A. M. & Zaleski, A. C. Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Soc. Influ. 3(1), 4–23 (2008).
Google Scholar
Longoni, C., Gollwitzer, P. M. & Oettingen, G. A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 50, 158–165 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bratanova, B. et al. Savouring morality. Moral satisfaction renders food of ethical origin subjectively tastier. Appetite 91, 137–149 (2015).
Google Scholar
Stets, J. E. & Biga, C. F. Bringing identity theory into environmental sociology. Sociol. Theory 21(4), 398–423 (2003).
Google Scholar
Balundė, A., Jovarauskaitė, L. & Poškus, M. S. Exploring the relationship between connectedness with nature, environmental identity, and environmental self-identity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open (2019).
Google Scholar
Burke, P. J. The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Soc. Psychol. Q. 43(1), 18–29 (1980).
Google Scholar
McCall, G. J. & Simmons, J. L. Identities and Interactions (Free Press, 1978).
Turner, R. H. The role and the person. AJS 84(1), 1–23 (1978).
Google Scholar
Stryker, S. Identity salience and role performance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. JMF 30, 558–564 (1968).
Stryker, S. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version (Benjamin-Cummings/Blackburn, 1980).
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A. & White, K. M. The theory of planned behaviour: self-identity, social identity and group norms. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 38(3), 225–244 (1999).
Google Scholar
Conner, M. & Armitage, C. J. Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research. JASP 28, 1429–1464 (1998).
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. I Am what I Am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environ. Behav. 46(5), 626–657 (2014).
Google Scholar
Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature (MIT Press, 2003).
Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W. & Tabanico, J. Self, Identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. JASP 37, 1219–1247 (2007).
Gollwitzer, P. M., Sheeran, P., Michalski, V. & Seifert, A. E. When intentions go public: Does social reality widen the intention-behavior gap?. Psychol. Sci. 20(5), 612–618 (2009).
Google Scholar
Grębosz-Krawczyk, M., Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. & Flaszewska, S. From words to deeds: The impact of pro-environmental self-identity on green energy purchase intention. Energies 14(18), 5732 (2021).
Google Scholar
Catellani, P., & Carfora, V. Norms, identities, and values. In The Social Psychology of Eating (Springer, 2023).
Zhao, A. L., Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N. & Hanmer-Lloyd, S. Cultivating sustainable consumption: The role of harmonious cultural values and pro-environmental self-identity. J. Consum. Behav. 23(2), 1014–1031 (2024).
Google Scholar
Udall, A. M., De Groot, J. I., De Jong, S. B. & Shankar, A. How I see me—A meta-analysis investigating the association between identities and pro-environmental behavior. Front. psychol. 12, 582421 (2021).
Google Scholar
Caso, D., Carfora, V. & Conner, M. T. Predicting intentions and consumption of fruit and vegetables in Italian adolescents. Effects of anticipated regret and self-identity. Psicol. Soc. 11(3), 319–326 (2016).
Carfora, V., Caso, D. & Conner, M. The role of self-identity in predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Appetite 106, 23–29 (2016).
Google Scholar
Ryan, J. C. et al. Exploring the intersection between diet and self-identity: A cross-sectional study with Australian adults. JNEB 54(1), 20–27 (2022).
Qasim, H., Yan, L., Guo, R., Saeed, A. & Ashraf, B. N. The defining role of environmental self-identity among consumption values and behavioral intention to consume organic food. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16(7), 1106 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gravelines, Ž, Banytė, J., Dovalienė, A. & Gadeikienė, A. The role of green self-identity and self-congruity in sustainable food consumption behavior. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 13(2), 336–356 (2022).
Su, K., Su, Y. L. & Kuo, Y. M. The moderating effect of pro-environmental self-identity in the relationship between abnormally-shaped foods and purchase intention. AIMS Environ. Sci. 7(3), 247 (2020).
Google Scholar
Arman, S. M. & Mark-Herbert, C. Ethical pro-environmental self-identity practice: The case of second-hand products. Sustainability 14, 2154 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bloch, S. Green tinted glasses: Fashion consumption practices as pro-environmental behaviors. UVM Honors College Senior Theses 531 (2023).
Lomo-Lovinski, N. & Hahn, K. American consumer perceptions of sustainable fashion, fast fashion, and mass fashion practices. Int. J. Soc. Sustain. Econ. Soc. Cult. Context 16(1), 15–27 (2020).
Lapinski, M. K. & Rimal, R. N. An explication of social norms. Commun. Theory 15(2), 127–147 (2005).
Google Scholar
Rimal, R. N. Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: A test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Commun. 23(2), 103–116 (2008).
Google Scholar
Rimal, R. N. & Real, K. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Commun. Theory 13(2), 184–203 (2003).
Google Scholar
Rimal, R. N. & Real, K. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Commun. Res. 32(3), 389–414 (2005).
Google Scholar
Terry, D. J. & Hogg, M. A. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22(8), 776–793 (1996).
Google Scholar
Masson, T. & Fritsche, I. Adherence to climate change-related ingroup norms: Do dimensions of group identification matter?. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 44(5), 455–465 (2014).
Google Scholar
Tarabashkina, O. Promoting sustainable consumption: the role of social norms, ingroup framing and identification (Doctoral dissertation, 2022).
Smith, J. R. & Louis, W. R. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35(4), 433–446 (2009).
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T. & Smith, E. R. Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79(4), 602–616 (2000).
Google Scholar
Fekadu, Z. & Kraft, P. Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: A useful addition or an unhelpful artifice?. JASP 31(7), 1393–1410 (2001).
Smith, J. R. et al. Interaction effects in the theory of planned behavior: The interplay of self-identity and past behavior. JASP 37(11), 2726–2750 (2007).
Verplanken, B. & Orbell, S. Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. JASP 33(6), 1313–1330 (2003).
Gollwitzer, P. M., Wicklund, R. A. & Hilton, J. L. Admission of failure and symbolic self-completion: Extending Lewinian theory. JPSP 43, 358–371 (1982).
Lalot, F., Quiamzade, A., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. & Gollwitzer, P. M. When does self-identity predict intention to act green? A self-completion account relying on past behavior and majority-minority support for pro-environmental values. J. Environ. Psychol. 61, 79–92 (2019).
Google Scholar
McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R. & Dato-on, M. C. The business of ethics and gender. J. Bus. Ethics 64, 101–116 (2006).
Google Scholar
Cho, E., Gupta, S. & Kim, Y. K. Style consumption: Its drivers and role in sustainable apparel consumption. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 39(6), 661–669 (2015).
Google Scholar
Tjokrosoeharto, M. A. & Paramita, E. L. Understanding consumer purchase intention to purchase sustainable fashion: The moderating role of gender perception. DIJB 4(2), 136–146 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bianchi, C. & Gonzalez, M. Exploring sustainable fashion consumption among eco-conscious women in Chile. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 31(4), 375–392 (2021).
Lee, K. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. JMC 26(2), 87–96 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wei, X. & Jung, S. Understanding Chinese consumers’ intention to purchase sustainable fashion products: The moderating role of face-saving orientation. Sustainability 9(9), 1570 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. Predicting the significance of consumer environmental values, beliefs, and norms for sustainable fashion behaviors: The case of second-hand clothing. APMR 29(2), 179–194 (2024).
Mardia, K. V. Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika 57(3), 519–553 (1970).
Google Scholar
Yuan, K. H. & Bentler, P. M. Robust mean and covariance structure analysis through iteratively reweighted least squares. Psychometrika 65(1), 43–58 (2000).
Google Scholar
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR 18(1), 39–50 (1981).
Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411–423 (1988).
Google Scholar
Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F. & Waller, M. A. Latent variables in business logistics research: Scale development and validation. J. Bus. Logist. 15, 145–172 (1994).
Rönkkö, M. & Cho, E. An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organ. Res. Methods 25(1), 6–14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48(2), 1–36 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246 (1990).
Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. & Bonett, D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88(3), 588–606 (1980).
Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R. & Lewis, C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38(1), 1–10 (1973).
Google Scholar
Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999).
Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 1 (Sage, 2002).
Vanlaar, W. Multilevel modeling in traffic safety research: Two empirical examples illustrating the consequences of ignoring hierarchies. Traffic Inj. Prev. 6(4), 311–316 (2005).
Google Scholar
Shukri, M., Jones, F. & Conner, M. Theory of planned behaviour, psychological stressors and intention to avoid violating traffic rules: A Multi-Level modelling analysis. Accident; analysis and prevention. Accid. Anal. Prev. 169, 106624 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schüz, B., Brick, C., Wilding, S. & Conner, M. Socioeconomic status moderates the effects of health cognitions on health behaviors within participants: Two multibehavior studies. Ann. Behav. Med. 54(1), 36–48 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82(13), 1–26 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lüdecke, P. ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. J. Open Source Softw. 3(26), 772 (2018).
Google Scholar
Long, J. A. jtools: Analysis and presentation of social scientific data. Version 2.2.0. Software per computer. (2022). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/jtools.
Wickham, H. forcats: Tools for working with categorical variables (Factors) (Version 1.0.0). (2023).
Garson, G. D. Hierarchical linear modeling: Guide and applications (Sage, 2013).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V., Caso, D., Sparks, P., & Conner, M. Moderating effects of pro-environmental self-identity on pro-environmental intentions and behaviour: A multi-behaviour study. J. Environ. Psychol. 53, 92–99 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hayduk, L. A., & Littvay, L. Should researchers use single indicators, best indicators, or multiple indicators in structural equation models? BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12, 1–17 (2012).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V., Buscicchio, G. & Catellani, P. Integrating personal and pro-environmental motives to explain Italian women’s purchase of sustainable clothing. Sustainability. 13 (19), 10841 (2021).
Google Scholar
Joanes, T. Personal norms in a globalized world: norm-activation processes and reduced clothing consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 941–949 (2019).
Google Scholar
De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Morin, A. J. & Schmidt, P. Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of university students’ intentions to buy fair trade products. JCP. 37, 485–505 (2014).
Zhu, B., Xu, P. & Wang, K. A multi-group analysis of gender difference in consumer buying intention of agricultural products via live streaming. RWAE. 4 (1), 25–35 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vesely, S. & Klöckner, C. A. Global social norms and environmental behavior. Environ. Behav. 50 (3), 247–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lachance, M. J., Beaudoin, P. & Robitaille, J. Adolescents’ brand sensitivity in apparel: influence of three socialization agents. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 27 (1), 47–57 (2003).
Google Scholar
Adıgüzel, F., Linkowski, C. & Olson, E. Do sustainability labels make us more negligent? rebound and moral licensing effects in the clothing industry. In Sustainability in the Textile and Apparel Industries (ed. Muthu, S. S., Gardetti M. A.) 1–18Springer, (2020).
Knäuper, B., Rabiau, M., Cohen, O. & Patriciu, N. Compensatory health beliefs: scale development and psychometric properties. Psychol. Health. 19 (5), 607–624 (2004).
Google Scholar
Rabiau, M., Knäuper, B. & Miquelon, P. The eternal quest for optimal balance between maximizing pleasure and minimizing harm: the compensatory health beliefs model. Br. J. Health Psychol. 11 (1), 139–153 (2006).
Google Scholar
Rabiau, M. A. Balancing Temptations and Health Goals: The role of Compensatory Health Beliefs (McGill University, 2006).
Dolan, P. & Galizzi, M. M. Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy. J. Econ. Psychol. 47, 1–16 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kronick, I. & Knäuper, B. Temptations elicit compensatory intentions. Appetite. 54 (2), 398–401 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hope, A. L., Jones, C. R., Webb, T. L., Watson, M. T. & Kaklamanou, D. The role of compensatory beliefs in rationalizing environmentally detrimental behaviors. Environ. Behav. 50 (4), 401–425 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sorrell, S., Gatersleben, B. & Druckman, A. The limits of energy sufficiency: a review of the evidence for rebound effects and negative spillovers from behavioral change. ERSS. 64, 101439 (2020).
Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: a review. Int. J. Psychol. 49, 141–157 (2014).
Google Scholar
Khorram Niaki, M., Torabi, S. & Nonino, F. Why manufacturers adopt additive manufacturing technologies: the role of sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 105, 438–446 (2019).
Udall, A. M., De Groot, J. I., De Jong, S. B. & Shankar, A. How I see me—A meta-analysis investigating the association between identities and pro-environmental behavior. Front. Psychol. 12, 582421 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A. & Whitwell, G. J. Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behavior of ethically minded consumers. J. Bus. Ethics. 97, 139–158 (2010).
Google Scholar
Carfora, V. & Catellani, P. Psychosocial drivers influencing local food purchasing: beyond availability, the importancenof trust in farmers. Front. Nutr. 10, 1204732 (2023).
Google Scholar
Busalim, A., Fox, G. & Lynn, T. Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 46 (5), 1804–1828 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schiaroli, V., Dangelico, R. M. & Fraccascia, L. Mapping sustainable options in the fashion industry: a systematic literature review and a future research agenda. Sustain. Dev. (2024).
Google Scholar
Vesterinen, E. & Syrjälä, H. Sustainable anti-consumption of clothing: a systematic literature review. Clean. Respons Consum. 5, 100061 (2022).
McNeill, L. & Moore, R. Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. J. Consum. Stud. 39(3), 212–222 (2015).
Google Scholar
link